Farm bill impacts everyone, says Catholic rural life
official
Gronski
spoke March 31 at St. Michael Church in
The farm bill is a multiyear omnibus bill
that is reauthorized every four to seven years. As an omnibus bill, it includes
policies on a wide range of agricultural and food-related issues, including
commodity subsidies, international aid, food assistance, conservation,
agricultural trade, credit, rural development and research.
Many provisions from the last farm bill --
the Farm Security & Rural Investment Act of 2002 -- will expire in 2007.
Congress is expected to reauthorize the bill this year.
While the forum focused on four components
of the 2007 farm bill -- food stamps and nutrition programs, producer and
commodity issues, conservation policy, and international food production and
trade -- the legislation addresses much more, said Dale Hennen,
director of the rural life office for the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis.
The forum’s sponsors -- including the
Archdiocesan Rural Life Conference, the Office for Social Justice, Catholic
Charities and the National Catholic Rural Life Conference based in Des Moines,
Iowa -- laid out four main goals for the 2007 bill: ensuring low-income people
an adequate, nutritious diet; strengthening rural communities; helping farmers
earn a sufficient livelihood and be good stewards of the land; and allowing
small-scale farmers in other countries to earn a living.
Catholic rural interest groups are
advocating changes from the 2002 farm bill in several areas, including
government subsidies. Currently, the farm bill concentrates subsidies, or
production-based money grants, on corn, cotton, rice, wheat and soybeans.
“If you produce more, you get more
subsidies,” Hennen said. “It isn’t based on need --
that’s the problem.”
Sixty percent of
Capping subsidies and government support is
important, Gronski said. The government, he added,
should also reward “sustainability and community.” Subsidy caps would create a
more level playing field and allow all farmers equal access to the markets, Hennen said.
Crop diversification is
also important, Gronski said during the forum.
Current subsidies promote the overproduction of feed grains and sugars. Under
the 2002 farm bill, only a small amount of support goes to fruit and vegetable
production, grazing operations, organic farming and other sustainable farming
systems.
Hennen
said he wants improvements in the 2002 farm bill’s Conservation and Security
Program, which provides incentives to landowners and farmers to practice
sustainable and earth-friendly farming methods.
“Right now we’re basing our payments on
production, which is often harmful to the environment and is geared toward
larger farmers,” Hennen said. “(Capping subsides) is
geared toward people, farmers or others, who take care of the land while they
are producing, which is of much greater benefit to society,” he said.
Currently, the food stamp program and other
nutrition and food programs are the largest of the farm bill’s mandatory
spending programs. Mandatory spending is federal funding that does not need to
be appropriated each year by Congress.
Donna Neste said
she relied on food stamps and other nutrition assistance after her husband lost
his job in the same month she became pregnant. She credits food assistance
programs with the health of her son, who is now 24. “I don’t know how he would
have turned out ... if he wouldn’t have gotten the right nutrition as a baby,”
she said.
Catholic organizations want the 2007 farm
bill to keep the food stamp program’s entitlement structure, while making
benefit allotments adequate to purchase enough healthy food. They also want it
to broaden eligibility and connect more eligible people with the benefits.