Guest Columnist
Blessings and curses going hand in hand with Catholic
media
By Tom Sheridan
Catholic News Service
Catholic media
enjoy many blessings but suffer from many curses. Catholic media share much
with their secular brethren, competing for the same readers, for the same
advertising dollar, for the same opportunity to make their point in the mass
market. (That’s mass with a lowercase “m.”)
That’s
one of the curses.
But
unlike secular media, which often seem to exist to make noise and a profit,
Catholic media exist to make a point and a difference. That’s a blessing. (OK,
there’s “prophet,” too, though that’s probably stretching the pun.)
True,
some secular publications don’t fit that mold, and some Catholic ones --
probably too many -- are judged more by their balance sheets than by their
content. Still, the comparison is valid.
Like
secular journalists, their Catholic counterparts get a kick out of what they
do. When I labored at the
One
big curse is that people often let secular media define the church.
Secular
media can be a great ally to the church. However, they cannot always be counted
on to understand faith, especially when being outrageous gains more notice than
being truthful.
A few
years ago, a
No
matter that there’s a grand tradition of blessing homes, people and even places
of business. There are worse things than acknowledging the presence of God in
everyday life.
The
church ministers daily to the world’s hurts and pains. Its work among the poor,
its efforts to keep inner-city schools open and its many calls for justice
often go unnoted by the secular media.
But
blessing a business -- even a generous business whose donations help support
the church and its works -- that becomes Page One news?
Such
dismissive reporting can diminish the church.
Without
Catholic media, expecting Catholics to understand what’s happening in the
church or what the church is saying is, frankly, foolish.
The
clergy sex abuse crisis has also taken its toll on the church’s reputation.
Yes, secular media took the lead in exposing, though sometimes
sensationalizing, the problem. However, many Catholic
publications did a credible job of reporting it, warts and all.
The
church is working to repair its battered public face, though you’ll read about
that more in church media than in secular. That, sadly, is often dismissed as
“cheerleading.”
But
Catholic media must be more than just cheerleaders; they must offer
perspectives not available elsewhere.
Sometimes,
though, that “church perspective” becomes yet another curse rather than the
blessing it ought to be. Many Catholics aren’t pleased with church positions on
war, poverty, immigration and even the death penalty. Others balk at the
renewal of the Latin Mass and similar traditions, taking it out on the church’s
media.
In his Jan. 24 message for World Communications Day (May
4), Pope Benedict XVI acknowledged that secular media’s “meteoric technical
evolution” gives them the potential for more blessings and curses. He
encouraged secular media to cease being proponents of manipulation and instead
press for justice by espousing information based in truth.
The
challenge for Catholic media is much the same, though one would think it at
least has a head start. That, surely, is a blessing.
Here’s
a comparison which might help explain the value of Catholic media, especially
this month. The Wall Street Journal, that most secular of newspapers, once
turned a slur from a Soviet leader into a slogan: “Capitalist tool.”
If
the worst that can be said about Catholic media is that they are a “tool of
faith,” I’ll take it.
And
if you’re reading this in a Catholic publication, you deserve blessings, too.